About TUCC
Education Link
Research Link
Initiatives Link
Getting Involved Link
Resources Link
911 Crisis Resources
Event Planning Aids
Job and Internship Information and Links
Links to Child & Family Organizations/Websites beyond Tufts
TUCC Newsletter Archives
TUCC Grants Link

TUCC NEWS

Information and Invitations from
the Tufts University Center for Children
January 2006 Edition

A pdf version will soon be available.

INDEX/CONTENTS
Introduction
Featured Interview: Associate Provost Vincent Manno
Fellowships/Funding Opportunities
About Tufts University Center for Children

 

INTRODUCTION

Dear Colleagues,

This issue of the TUCC electronic newsletter features an important interview with Associate Provost Vincent Manno conducted in this past fall. Associate Provost Manno is responsible for oversight of the interdisciplinary centers. He is planning interdisciplinary university priorities with thought and care.

Congratulations to the TUCC/University College Applied Research project awardees!! This year, all four of them will focus on childhood nutrition and physical activity. Watch for some exciting chronicles as the projects progress.

The TUCC staff wishes a happy, healthy, and peaceful 2006 to all of you!!

Howard Spivak
Lois Wainstock Jackie Calahong
Director Associate Director Program Coordinator
   
.
ANNOUNCEMENTS

2005-2006 APPLIED RESEARCH PROJECTS
INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO
PREVENTING CHILDHOOD OBESITY
FUNDED PROPOSALS

FANtastic Kids Program
Tara Agrawal, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
Advisor: Parke E. Wilde

Measuring Fruit and Vegetable Consumption at School Lunch:
Plate Waste Pilot Study

Alison Tovar, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
Advisor: Aviva Must

Research into Action:
Understanding and Improving Nutrition in Somerville and Mattapan

Laura Spring, School of Arts and Sciences (Biology/Community Health)
Advisors: Gary McKissick and Rebecca O'Malley

Integrated Nutrition Education and Urban Agriculture
for Obesity Prevention: Lessons from Cuba

Meaghan Murphy, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy
Advisors: John Hammock and Beatrice Rodgers

CONGRATULATIONS TO THESE OUTSTANDING STUDENTS!!

 

Civic Engagement Research Group (CERG) presents

"POLITICS, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THE MIS-USE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL"
JAMES JENNINGS, DEPT. OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
AND PLANNING
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2006 FROM 12:00PM-1:30PM
Location TBA/Light Buffet Lunch

Professor Jennings is a professor in the Dept. of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning at Tufts University. He is the author of Welfare Reform and the Revitalization of Inner City Neighborhoods (2003); guest editor of a special issue of The Annals, Journal of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, Race, Politics and Community Development in U.S. Cities (2004); and author of Understanding the Nature of Poverty in Urban America (1994) and The Politics of Black Empowerment (1992).

No RSVP needed. Co-leaders: Susan Ostrander, Sociology; Kent Portney, Political Science Co-sponsors: Dept. of Sociology, Dept. of Political Science; Molly Mead, Tufts University College for Citizenship and Public Service.

For more information, please contact:
susan.ostrander@tufts.edu or kent.portney@tufts.edu

ELIOT-PEARSON DEPT. OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT SPRING 2006
COLLOQUIUM SERIES

All colloquia will meet from 3:30pm-5:00pm in the Curriculum Lab, Room 129,
105 College Avenue, Medford Campus.

January 30: "Beyond the University: 'Research <-> Practice' in
Infant Mental Health and Early Intervention."

Libby Zimmerman, PhD
Visiting Scholar, Eliot-Pearson Dept. of Child Development
Focus Counseling and Consultation, Inc.

March 6: "Families Across Cultures: Eco-Cultural and Global Perspectives on Family Change."
James Georgas, PhD
Emeritus Professor of Psychology, University of Athens, Greece
Onassis Public Benefits Foundation University Seminars Program

March 27: "How to Measure 'Scaffolding?' Research <-> Practice Opportunities in Play, Problem-Solving, and Social Interaction."
Nina Granott, PhD
Visiting Scholar, Eliot-Pearson Dept. of Child Development
OORIM, LLC

Information: Donald Wertlieb, 617-627-3355
or Janie Orthey Rockett, 617-627-2078.

 

FIRST ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPONTANEOUS ANIMAL MODELS
OF DISEASE FOR CLINICIANS AND SCIENTISTS
THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2006 FROM 1:00PM-4:00PM

Reception to follow from 4:00pm-5:30pm
Jaharis Lecture Hall, 150 Harrison Avenue
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University

Sponsored by the Residents' Enhanced Veterinary Education and Academic Learning (REVEAL) Program at Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine

For more information, please contact:
Dr. Lisa Freeman, 508-887-4523.


CALL FOR PAPERS/ONLINE ABSTRACT SUBMISSION
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION (APHA)
134TH ANNUAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 4-8, 2006 IN BOSTON MA

APHA is currently accepting abstracts for its annual meeting in November 2006. The theme of the meeting is Public Health and Human Rights. Abstracts must be limited to 250 words or less. Two-page summaries (if required) must be less than 2000 words. Each contributed paper must be categorized under one of the topics or areas of interest described in the call for papers. An abstract can only be submitted to one Section, SPIG or Caucus. You do not need to be an APHA member to submit an abstract - However, if your abstract is accepted for presentation you must become an APHA Individual member and you must register for the Annual Meeting. The abstracts being submitted should not be presented or published prior to the APHA Annual Meeting.

Submission Deadlines: Various dates in February and March 2006.

Website: http://apha.confex.com/apha/134am/oasys.epl

INTERVIEW

FEATURED INTERVIEW: ASSOCIATE PROVOST VINCENT MANNO


LW: Is there anything in your professional experience that has led you to where you are? How did you start to think more structurally?

VM: : In terms of the university? Is that the context of the question?

LW: Yes…or even in more terms of the world, or in terms of the academy, or in terms of your thinking about interdisciplinary centers.

VM: Well, I guess one influence that attracted me to faculty work, in general, and then more academic leadership roles, is the ability to work across disciplines. At a university, you can work on things that you are interested in, but learn an awful lot about things that you are not an expert in, because all the experts are available. That's what brought me here. I also found out that I liked working with people. That was a discovery! I became Department Chair fairly early in my career, and that experience was a good one, although it was baptism by fire. I found out through that experience that I liked trying to get people together to figure out how we move as a group, how we fit into larger groups.

Things have evolved, even in engineering and science. I went to school at an end of a period in engineering and science when things were still very compartmentalized and silo'd (sp?). Biologists really didn't interact much with chemists, who really didn't interact much with engineers, etc. Everyone had their role; you either were this or you were that. When I was in school, I think the faculty were fairly certain that what they were doing both in teaching and in research would be the major part of the knowledge that their students would need for a good part of their students' career. They knew where their students were heading. Now, I think we're much more uncertain. What I tell my students is that the one thing I know for sure is that I don't know what they're going to do in 10 years.

So you really have to think about what you teach. You have to realize the research that you are doing, while significant, is probably going to have a much shorter shelf life than research in the past because things change so dramatically. Our students need to realize that the hard part of any profession is not answering the questions, it is figuring out what the questions are.

LW: So you're not just a straight-line person?

VM: No, I don't think so, except in maybe geometry!!

LW: Could you describe your work with the cross-school centers and what lead you to accept this challenge?

VM: First, the most important thing about my work with the cross school programs is that it's just beginning. I think that's a critical point. I come to this role with little baggage or a preconceived agenda. I'll take that as an advantage for me. I feel some freedom in that.

How I came to this role? - and I think this is one of your questions related to what led me to accept the challenge. Over the years, the one thing that I perceived about cross school or interdisciplinary programs at Tufts was that there were many of them. It was very hard for me to track as a faculty member. Even at the School of Engineering level, I had a challenge figuring out where and how all these centers connected. The new administration of President Bacow and Provost Bharucha gave us a clear message that Tufts needed to act as a university, as opposed to a collection of separate units. I saw that message as a real shift. An uncoordinated university view is not one that's compatible with effective cross school initiatives. With the new administration committed to a university approach, I am convinced that there is substantive work to be done now.

It's not easy. There's no center or program that I have found about which I can say, "oh what I've learned so far is not impressive; they're not doing good work." However, we know that there are strengths and weaknesses and that we need to act strategically. The cross school programs and centers have the benefit of being more agile and innovative but at the same time they need to answer to higher standards. This is in contrast to the schools. The schools answer to benchmark measures, each of the schools struggle with this on a daily basis. The centers on the other hand, often operate in more isolation. There are no natural mechanisms in place for them to assess themselves or to be assessed.

One unfortunate commonality that I detect in many of our cross school programs is a sense of disconnectedness or orphan status. Now I don't want to talk about blame; this is just the reality of what it is. The "orphan" nature needs to stop. Everyone needs to understand where they fit in. I think that you always operate better knowing where you fit, as opposed to spending much of your time figuring out where you fit. We need to discern which of these programs add significant value to the university and if they do, we should be recognizing them as important entities. Then, they need direct connectivity to the university.

That's basically the role I've taken on. I see my role as dual. There is an administrative aspect. I'm not shirking from that but the second dimension is more important to me - providing the direct conduit, back and forth to the central administration, to understand where the cross school programs are going, and to communicate to the cross school programs what's really going on. It's important for me to help them do their reality checks. If I'm more plugged in as things are evolving in the early stages, I'll be in a better position to help the programs go one way or the other before they go far down a path that is not productive.

The real challenge is how to position the cross school initiatives so that their value added is clear. So, for example - if cross school programs give the university the ability to attract top flight faculty; if we can recruit outstanding students because we have this special program; if we can bring in more outside support and greater recognition than the schools would be able to do on their own - the cross school programs can add that missing dimension. That's a primary role for the cross school programs, to act as catalysts. What the cross school programs need is to be plugged in, to have the support necessary to accomplish their mission. It's crucial that those folks associated with the program be recognized inside and outside the university as the leaders in the various disciplines that they represent. Often, when you get involved with assessing any program, the first set of questions you get from outside assessors are, "who are the major players in your program?"

LW: As you've been studying the centers, are you finding that we have the right centers? Is this how they need to be configured?

VM: Unfortunately, I'm going to have to give you what I know is an unsatisfactory answer, but I don't know at this point. But is the top bullet on my list. We need to try to figure out if there are overlaps or redundancies, and if we are positioned correctly. What is the quality of what they're doing? The first thing is internal work; the second needs an external component.

The right way to start is to concentrate on the most visible cross school programs. I would include on that list the Tufts Institute of the Environment (TIE), the Water: Systems, Science and Society (WSSS) program, Tufts University Center for Children (TUCC), and the Institute of Global Leadership (IGL). The Institute for Global Leadership was loosely associated with Arts and Sciences, but now is positioned as a university level program. There are other programs - but the four I just mentioned are the ones that are clearly on my radar screen. My goal is to learn much more about these, to try to synthesize what they do, and to think a bit about where they belong.

All programs benefit from periodic external review to help calibrate our thinking. We're actually in the middle of an assessment of TIE right now, both internal and external. The water programs are too new to really assess, but they are putting together an external advisory board now. I think the right first steps for the WSSS program are to establish how they actually operate and make their external advisory board functional. My inclination is that TUCC is probably more in the TIE category. I'm looking forward to interacting with the TUCC leadership like you and Howard and the Steering Committee, to understand TUCC, and to start looking where it should go.

LW: Do you also think that we categorize them in the right way - for example, is children and families right, or should it be communities?

VM: Again, I feel that I can't say yes or no yet, but I think that's the right question to ask. I think the challenge for us is to figure out how the cross school programs have unique Tufts qualities. What I view as Tufts qualities are agility and a focus on innovation, and trying to deal with actual problems in contrast it to other institutions. It gets us out of the mode of saying "we're not Harvard, MIT, or whoever, but..." I think the centers and the schools have to be able to articulate their mission as saying, "this cross school program IS this, without any 'buts'. We are Tufts University, and we are focused on solving this type of problem, of being agile enough to change, and not being burdened by barriers of concrete and marble pillars." Cross school programs need to build on this tradition. Whether it is about children or community, there is the tradition of being out there for the children and the community; the clinics have always been there, the dental and medical practitioners have always been there. The fact that students and real world problems exist didn't come as a news bulletin to Tufts people. What we're about is figuring how you take the knowledge that we have as an institution and that other people have created, and channel this knowledge into solving problems that affect people.

So to a certain extent, whether it's called the Tufts University Center for Children or Tufts University Center for Community, whatever - it is the mission that is more important. Nevertheless, at the right time we should take a look at the name, and whether it captures the mission. Naming is tough. As soon as you name something, there's implicitness to what you're not. So, if you're the Tufts Center for Children, then you start to answer questions, like "Are adolescents children?"

LW: As you were talking, I was thinking about the whole concept of these centers. These centers, because everybody kind of did their own thing, they grew by their own individual interest rather than by university need. For example, the Center on Aging - like the Tufts University Center for Children, it's based on a population group rather than an issue.

VM: But is it? I have two reactions. First, I think it's important that all of the cross school initiatives continue to have that aspect to them. It's important that the people who are involved with programs like TUCC are committed to it, that it comes from their own passion, as opposed to the university deciding we should have a center on this or that.

Now, that doesn't mean that your evolution has to be completely internal. For example, we might look at a cross school program and decide that we don't have all the pieces there - perhaps it is positioning, perhaps it's leadership, perhaps it's the need for some specific area of expertise. On other hand, the program should have a core of folks for which the program is their major focus. I think it's a weakness to have a cross school program that may have a lot of buy-in but where everyone around the table participates in it as just one of the several things that they do. It needs to be what they are all about and a big part of the reason why they are here. Again with an open mind, it's that question I will be asking myself and others as I look at the programs.

Regarding your second question about whether it's a population group or an issue - again, it's both, isn't it? In the past, I think people would have said that it's a population. Now, we're in the midst of aging being something very different. As life expectancies go up, there are more healthy people, active and productive people in what we would call the "aged" or "aging" population. At the same time, we have issues of people who are not healthy, either mentally or physically, but who are alive. Twenty or thirty years ago, they were dying at younger ages. It kind of relates back to what I said about engineering. No matter what engineering field you're in these days, many more engineers and scientists are working on bio and health applications than when I went to school. A major motivation for that are people like me. I'm a member of the baby boomer generation. This is a very funny generation because we've all decided that they're not going to die (laughter). So, we're going to put an amazing amount of resources and money in that direction because dying is not part of our agenda (laughter).

LW: It's similar with kids, in terms of health care costs. I think it's like 70% or 80% of health care costs go at the other end of life - and yet there are kids that really ill that can't get health care. It's like a systemic thing.

VM: You're right, kids, like the aging population, are dependent. It's not a population that has internal advocacy. We see from our everyday news experience that being the child of an affluent family is very different from being a child from a poor family - even on a just the day to day health care that you get.

LW: Is there anything you want to add about your plans?

VM: As far as the plans are concerned, obviously this is an ongoing exercise, but it's a high priority. I would be upset with myself if a year from now we were having this conversation about TUCC, and I was still at the generalizations stage. Certainly, we are triaging things. The assessment of TIE and the various environmental programs, as to where we go from here, are my highest priorities for this year. My goal is to help formulate a university level plan by the end of this academic year, as far as TIE is concerned. I see the other programs, in particular TUCC, being next as far as setting its future - whether that future involves an evolutionary change or a revolutionary change.

One thing that's driving that is a resource issue. The resources for the cross school programs really come from two places. One is from internal resources. If it's an internal resource, it's basically budgeting within the overall university framework. While we don't like to think of it this way, if it's the resources that we know about now, to a certain extent it's a fixed sum game. So, if a cross school program is going to be supported, it's going to be supported because of people agreeing that this is an important thing we should do as an institution and that we see clear cross benefits.

On the other hand, and more important, are external resources - fundraising, capital campaign, and the like. Just as the schools are preparing for the next capital campaign, and refining their own priorities and their case statements, my goal over this year is to work to articulate what are the university-level cross school priorities so that they have case statements in a capital campaign that right are out there as advancement targets. I have an awareness of what the schools' priorities are, and my job is to help facilitate as many connections as possible. So, the cross school programs should not only have their own place in the capital campaign, but also the explicit connection to the school will be right there as far as what their goals are.

So that's my focus this year - TIE, WSSS, TUCC, and IGL and getting to at least catalog the other programs. We have to work through how these and other programs should evolve and function as the catalysts that the university needs. It's already been a busy year but I am confident that we will get a great deal accomplished.

RESOURCES

New Additions to the TUCC Resource Room at 40 Carmichael Hall
We encourage you to let students know that we have many publications not usually found in bound collections. Faculty and students are welcome to search our extensive database of material.

  • Investing in Children: An Early Learning Strategy for Washington State, from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
  • 50-State Analysis of Medicaid Benefit Coverage for Children Without EPSDT, from the Maternal and Child Health Policy Research Center.
  • In a Time of Growing Need: State Choices Influence Health Coverage Access for Children and Families, from the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (October 2005).
  • Enhancing Child Development Services in Medicaid Managed Care Toolkit: Best Clinical and Administrative Practices for Medicaid, from the Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc
  • Issue Brief: Integrating MCH and Oral Health Programs to Improve Health, from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), November 2005.

Other Resources

The Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health provides interactive data search tools, survey results, technical help via email or phone, and other resources on child health and well being indicators.

The State of the World's Children 2006: Excluded and Invisible is now available on the UNICEF website. The report features customized statistical tables, audio interviews, photo essays, personal profiles of children, and information on issues affecting children today, including HIV/AIDS, poverty, street children, trafficking, discrimination, disabilities, and child labor.

The Center on Children and Families from the Brookings Institution focuses on research and activities designed to improve understanding of the reasons for poverty or low income, especially among working families, and the potential of various policies to improve their prospects and the life chances of their children. Expands on the "Welfare and Beyond" initiative.

State Approaches to Promoting Young Children's Healthy Mental Development: A Survey of Medicaid, Maternal and Child Health, and Mental Health Agencies from the National Academy of State Healthy Policy (NASHP) examines how states are promoting the healthy mental development of children age 3 and under, and looks at critical issues, from program funding concerns to the availability of qualified mental health providers.

The MyPyramid Plan website from the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture provides kids with resources and information to help them make smart choices regarding their food intake and physical activity levels.

Childhood Obesity News from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation:

Iron Deficiency, Prolonged Bottle-Feeding, and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Young Children, from the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (Vol. 159, No. 11, November 2005)

Action for Healthy Kids is a public-private partnership of more than 50 national organizations and government agencies representing education, health, fitness and nutrition, with the goal of addressing the epidemic of overweight, sedentary, and undernourished youth by focusing on changes in schools. The website includes resources for schools; information on events, programs, and reports; and state by state action data.

The Survey of Teens in the Greater Washington, D.C. Area was a study released by the Washington Post, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Harvard School of Public Health that assesses the views and attitudes of DC-area teens and their parents on priorities involving career, child-rearing and family; their personal hopes and fears; their outlook towards the nation's future; and generational differences in experiences and expectations. It also includes comparative data from a national survey of teens.

Rutgers University-Camden Center for Children and Childhood Studies provides support of interdisciplinary inquiry into the lives of children, and works to promote understanding, enrichment and the recognition of the significance of the experiences of childhood through research, education, and service and outreach projects.

The National Conference of State Legislatures website features an issue area section on Youth, featuring a 2006 audio conference on children and families, media articles on youth, and other resources for legislators in the areas or youth violence, out-of-school time programs, youth engagement in civic and policy development, youth in transition, and youth at-risk.

 

CONFERENCES/SEMINARS/SYMPOSIA

Health Action 2006 Grassroots Meeting. Sponsored by Families USA. January 26-28, 2006 in Washington, DC. RSVP by Wednesday, January 25 at 10:00am EST. Information: 202-628-3030 or info@familiesusa.org

Child Mental Health Forum 2005-2006. Sponsored by Judge Baker Children's Center, Harvard Medical School, and Children's Hospital Boston Dept. of Psychiatry. Wednesdays from 1:00pm-2:30pm at Judge Baker Children's Center, Room 111, 53 Parker Hill Avenue, Boston, MA 02120. Free parking, refreshments, and CME's/CEU's available. Upcoming lectures: February 1 - Cognitive and Behavioral Models of Child and Adolescent Self-Injury. March 1 - The Developmental Paths of High and Low Reactive Infant Temperaments. April 5 - Engendering Identity: Nonconforming Gender Identity. Information: 617-278-4293.

Call for Papers: Journal of Youth Development - Bridging Research and Practice. This is a new multidisciplinary applied research and practice on-line journal focused on the development of school-aged youth through the transition to adulthood (ages 6-22). Funded from the National 4-H Leadership Trust. Manuscripts accepted anytime. Deadline for consideration in the Fall issue is March. For information, contact Patricia Dawson, editor.

Conference - Creating Opportunities to Learn: A Forum for Addressing Disproportionality. Sponsored by the National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (NCCREST). February 15-17, 2006 in Denver, CO. Information: 303-556-3990 or shelley.zion@cudenver.edu.

2006 Annual Conference - Early Childhood: Building the Foundation for Lifelong Health. Sponsored by the Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs (AMCHP). March 4-8, 2006 in Arlington, VA. Information: 410-654-3010 or amchp@designingevents.com.

Family Support America's 11th Biennial International Conference. Sponsored by Family Support America. March 26-29, 2006 in Chicago, IL. Information hotline: 312/338-0900, ext. 152. Registration available online.

9th Annual Conference: Walking the Talk - Achieving the Promise of Authentic Partnerships. Sponsored by the Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH). May 31-June 3, 2006 in Minneapolis, MN. Early Bird Registration Deadline: April 16, 2006. Questions: Contact Anne Moreau, CCPH Program Assistant, 206-543-8178.

 

JOB OPPORTUNITIES/INTERNSHIPS
Carney, Sandoe and Associates (CS&A) is an educational recruitment firm that places teachers and administrators in private, independent and like-kind (charter, magnet, pilot and merit) schools across the nation. They have placed over 16,000 teachers and administrators in independent schools since 1977. Placement services are completely FREE for all candidates and teacher certification is not required. To become a teaching candidate with CS&A, please complete the candidate application online. In addition, candidates can also register online for the various 2006 Recruitment Conferences in Boston (February 10-11); Atlanta (February 17-18); Boston LINK (March 1-4); San Francisco (March 17-18); Washington D.C. (April 7-8). Information: Cindy Staton, Recruitment Assistant, 800-225-7986.

Pediatric Oncology- School Liaison Program Staff Position, The Pediatric Psychosocial Division at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Full-time position. The School Liaison Program provides consultative services to parents, school personnel, and medical staff regarding the neuropsychological late effects of cancer treatment and appropriate services for school-aged children who have completed active treatment involving the central nervous system. The successful candidate should have extensive knowledge and experience in neuropsychological evaluation and interpretation, school consultation, special education rules and regulations, and academic, social, and emotional interventions for students with learning difficulties. Applicant should be licensed in psychology, special education, or social work. Master's level candidates must have at least two years of relevant experience in school-related settings. Interested applicants should forward a letter of interest, curriculum vitae, and three letters of reference to: Nancy Frumer Styron, Psy.D., 44 Binney Street, D-312, Boston, MA 02115.

Two Postdoctoral Openings, The Center for Developmental Research, Örebro, Sweden: These positions would start this spring 2006 or by September 2006 at the latest, and extend over one year with the possibility of a second year, given adequate progress and availability of funds. The postdocs will work directly with Håkan Stattin and Margaret Kerr on issues of parent-adolescent relationships, parenting strategies, reciprocal parent-adolescent interactions, and their relations to adolescent adjustment. They will use longitudinal data that has already been collected for this purpose, and they will participate in carrying out a planned line of research. The working language at the Center is English, and there is much communication and cooperation among researchers, including 3 guest researchers/postdocs and 6 doctoral students. Salary is 18,000 Swedish Crowns per month, after taxes (about 2,000 euros or 2,600 US$). Housing help is provided and postdocs will have funding for travel to conferences. Successful candidates should have excellent data analytic skills, excellent writing skills, and knowledge and interest in the area of parenting and adolescent adjustment. Deadline: January 20, 2006. Applicants may send a CV, references, and a 2-3 page description of data analytic skills, research interests, and prior research experience to Håkan Stattin or Margaret Kerr.

Grant Reviewers for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF): The four bureaus of the ACYF - Child Care Bureau, Children's Bureau, Family and Youth Services Bureau, and Head Start Bureau - are currently recruiting grant reviewers and panel chairpersons. Both novice and experienced reviewers are welcome to apply. Many ACYF grant programs involve community-academic partnerships, community-based research and/or evaluation. Depending on the grant program, reviewers could be researchers, program evaluators, prevention specialists, curriculum developers, and front-line service providers, among others. The Family and Youth Services Bureau in particular is seeking youth advocates/workers, and young adults (ages 19-24) currently enrolled in an institution of higher learning (at least sophomore status), or with a degree from an accredited college/university with a discipline in the social sciences (public health, social work psychology or sociology), and/or have worked or been the recipient of long or short-term services from a residential facility. See website for information on how to apply.

Internship Opportunity, YouthBuild USA: YouthBuild USA is the national intermediary and technical assistance provider for over 220 local YouthBuild programs, which engage young adults ages 16-24 in a year-long program where they spend half their time in the classroom earning their GED or high school diploma, and the other half on a construction site, learning the construction trade and building affordable housing in their neighborhoods. The Civic Engagement Committee of the Affiliated Network of YouthBuild USA has written a voter engagement curriculum for low-income young adults, to be published in January 2006. There is a need to distribute and market this important piece to all YouthBuild programs, but also to other institutions that work with low-income youth: community colleges, service and conservation corps, community development organizations, and elsewhere. An important goal is increasing the number of youth that vote in the 2006 Congressional elections around the country, as well as the number of youth who may vote in the 2008 presidential elections. YouthBuild USA seeks a motivated individual with an interest for and passion about youth civic engagement, anti-poverty efforts, and marketing to serve as an intern for the winter-spring 2006 semester. Work-study funding possible. Contact: Anne Wright, Director, Affiliated Network, YouthBuild USA, 617-741-1202.

Senior Associate and Research Assistant, Casey Strategic Consulting Group, Annie E. Casey Foundation: The Casey Strategic Consulting Group is designed to support human service leaders and their systems in bringing about reform, with the goal of strengthening communities and family connections by working with public sector officials and agencies committed to substantially improving the lives of the citizens they serve. Both positions require Internet, Powerpoint, Excel, MSWord, and Access software proficiency, and availability to travel within the United States. Annual salary commensurate with experience. Benefits include medical, dental and vision insurance, vacation and sick leave, and a retirement plan. Positions will remain open until filled. To apply, email resume and cover letter to hrjobs@aecf.org. Information:

  • Senior Associate: full-time, mid-level position. Qualifications: Graduate degree, including but not limited to an MPP, MPA, MBA, JD, and MPH; Minimum of 15 years of post bachelor's degree experience (including graduate school); Demonstrated interest, working knowledge, and experience in programs related to health and human services, child welfare issues, or juvenile justice issues; Strong project management, research, writing, analytical, and communication skills;. Candidates with private sector consulting experience, public human services management experience, or public sector background in child welfare systems or juvenile justice are strongly encouraged to apply.
  • Research Assistant: Full-time, entry-level position. Qualifications: Bachelor's degree required; Demonstrated interest, working knowledge, and experience in programs related to health and human services, child welfare issues, or juvenile justice issues; Demonstrated academic excellence, strong research and analytical skills, and ability to prepare reports and conduct literature reviews; Ability to conceptualize and present information to a variety of audiences; Must be a team player with strong interpersonal skills and be able to work effectively with consultants, state and local government staff, CSCG staff, and other Foundation staff.

 

FELLOWSHIPS/FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

Listed in order by deadline

Solicitation for Proposals - Outcome Evaluations of Violence Prevention Programs: for proposals to conduct comprehensive evaluations of promising violence preventions programs with the objective of expanding the list of effective interventions to prevent violence to and by youth. Principal Sponsor: National Institute of Justice. Grant.gov Funding No. 2006-NIJ-1154; SL 000732. Applicants must submit a proposal that includes a program narrative, budget narrative/detail, and other forms as applicable. Deadline: February 24, 2006. Applications must be submitted online at Grants.gov; Paper applications are not accepted. Application instructions. Solcitation(pdf).

American Educational Research Association (AERA) Research Grants Program - Call for Proposals: This program is also supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the Institute of Education Sciences. Goals: to stimulate research on issues related to U.S. education policy and practice using NCES and NSF data sets; to improve the educational research community's firsthand knowledge of the range of data available at the two agencies and how to use them; and to increase the number of educational researchers using the data sets. Researchers must include the analysis of data from at least one NSF or NCES data set in the proposed study. Evaluation criteria: importance of the proposed policy issue, the strength of the methodological model and proposed statistical analysis, and relevant experience and research record of the applicant. Successful applicants will be expected to submit for review a progress report and a final report. Qualifications: Applicants may be U.S. citizens, U.S. permanent residents, or non-U.S. citizens, and must have received the doctoral degree by the start date of the grant. Researchers who have previously received a Research Grant as a PI or Co-PI, a Postdoctoral Fellowship, or an AERA Fellowship through the AERA Grants Program may not apply for a Research Grant. All applications must include: An AERA Research Grants Program cover sheet; Research proposal (limited to 7 single-spaced pages); Symbolic or figural model outlining the framework for the study; Proposed budget; Current curriculum vitae; Brief list of current other support (grants, awards, etc.). Minority researchers are strongly encouraged to apply. Deadlines: March 1, 2006 (for April review); September 1, 2006 (for October review). Two (2) hard copies of all required materials must be submitted and received by the deadlines above. Electronic submission will not be accepted, and incomplete applications will not be considered. Applications should be sent to: Ms. Jeanie Murdock, Program Director, AERA Grants Program, 5662 Calle Real, #254, Goleta, CA 93117-2317. Questions: Jeanie Murdock, Phone: 805-964-5264; Fax: 805-964-5054. Website

Using Technology to Augment the Effectiveness of Parenting Programs in the Prevention of Child Maltreatment: to help advance knowledge of the role of technology in improving parenting programs and outcomes. Specific proposals are being sought that take a previously demonstrated efficacious or effective parenting program and examine the effects of information and communication technology (e.g. cell phones, internet, video conferencing, web cameras, etc.) on program outcomes, fidelity, enrollment and attrition rates, and cost-effectiveness in reducing child maltreatment. Principal Sponsor: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NCIPC/CDC). Grant No. CDC-RFA-CE06-006. Deadline: March 19, 2006.

Neurodevelopment and Neuroendocrine Signaling in Adolescence: Relevance to Mental Health: request for research grant applications to identify neurodevelopmental and neuroendocrine mechanisms that impact emotional and cognitive development and emerging psychopathology during adolescence, utilizing animal models and human studies. Principal Sponsors: Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Grant #: PA-05-162. Application Submission Dates


Please let us know if the Center can be of assistance to you in pursuing any of these opportunities.

Please also let us know if you do pursue these leads, so that we can continue to improve our information exchange processes.

 

Tufts University Center for Children is an interdisciplinary, cross-school center dedicated to improving the lives of children, youth and their families in the nation and around the world. It is unique in its capacity to focus the research, teaching and advocacy resources of the University on helping children grow to healthy, productive adulthood.

The goals of Tufts University Center for Children are:

·
To better understand the needs of children, youth, families and the communities that support them
·
To demonstrate the promise of innovation in an interdisciplinary approach
·
To train academicians, students and practitioners in child and family studies
·
To make the world better for children

TUCC is sponsored by the Provost’s Office. Members of the 2004-2005 Steering Committee: Drusilla Brown (Arts & Sciences), Jeanne Goldberg (Nutrition), Richard Lerner (Arts and Sciences), Molly Mead (UCCPS), Ify Mora (Student Liason, UCCPS), Amy Pobst (Arts & Sciences), Paul Waldau (Veterinary), Anthony Schlaff (Medical), Analucia D. Schliemann (Arts & Sciences), Diane Souvaine (Engineering), Christina Economos (Nutrition), Anthi Tsamtsouris (Dental), William Moomaw (Fletcher), Donald Wertlieb (Arts & Sciences).

For further information, or to get involved, please contact Jackie Calahongat 617-627-4375, email tucc@tufts.edu, or visit our website.

Home | Site Map | Contact Us
Tufts University 2006 - All Rights Reserved